Silly Prophet, you knew well when You took her In

After complaining that her followers weren't resisting tyranny, while she was busy drinking at a lake, Madyson has proceeded to further frustrate her audience.

Madyson has taken to social media to crusade against Hank Kunneman due to his recent statements about her (43 minute mark in video).

Madyson's description of Copeland, relating him to Kunneman:

She wrote this on Telegram. Sounds pretty harsh right? But what did she say on Twitter (she also later posted this on her Telegram)?

She claims to forgive him, but also accuses him of being associated with a criminal on her Telegram. She also twists the Bible to accuse him on this Twitter post. 

For those unfamiliar with Mr. Kunneman, he is a pastor of Lord of Hosts church in Nebraska,  leads One Voice Ministries, and claims to be a prophet. His close associates include the likes of Kenneth Copeland, Katt Kerr, and Robin Bollock, many of whom also claim to be prophets.

Kunneman and company have made numerous predictions about President Trump, that are correctly categorized as false prophecies. 

I am no friend or supporter of the likes of Hank Kunneman, Katt Kerr, Robin Bollock, Amanda Grace, Johnny Enlow, Paul Oebel, Timothy Dixon, Kent Christmas, etc. and they should be considered false prophets and charlatans. 

None of these people have ever predicted the future accurately. Anything that these people said that has been touted as a "fulfilled prophecy" was either a safe bet, short-term prediction, 50/50 guess, or completely vague nonsense. Most of it is based on news cycles, political commentary, and public sentiment. 

They probably don't even care about conservative values, they just know Trump is good for clicks and ad revenue. They know where to tickle peoples' ears to get the most money out of their followers.

If you have read the previous posts on this blog, you know that I also do not believe Madyson's claims either. She is a also charlatan. It is extensively documented here, as well as other places. 

What she is doing here to Kunneman is one of Madyson's main gigs. Her primary claim to fame is accusing big name ministers, as well as few smaller ones. She mostly went after popular, but theologically questionable ministers, which has included Copeland. 

Copeland and his organizations are one of the main networks for these false Trump prophets. Once Madyson started accusing Copeland, it was only a matter if time before her followers started to unravel the implications of what she was saying. 

The writing was on the wall since Paul Oebel did his interview with Madyson. He let her open Pandora's Box. He let her accuse Kenneth Copeland, among many others, on his program. In fact, he encouraged her to do so. 

That was incredibly reckless, to say the least. Quite frankly, that's putting it lightly. It's actually downright abhorrent.

On Oebel's now since deleted post of his interview with Madyson, one of his followers started figuring out the implications of her accusations. 

As you can see, Paul Oebel admits he doesn't know anything. He's just giving ear to salacious gossip, and blasting it all over the Internet. 

At this time, Johnny Enlow was also proclaiming it was "time to clean up the pastor's aisle," as a man who has not been involved in any real minsitral capacity for several years. He spouted talking points similiar to Madyson, and in a few of his posts, supported her in the comments section. 

He was rightly corrected by many of his own followers that he shouldn't be giving hearsay a platform, but insisted he was in the right. He later also made convenient, sophistical claim of ignorance. 

Here he is referencing the comment in which he claimed he believed Madyson was credibile. 

Now Mr. "I don't claim to be a prophet, but I won't correct you if you call me that" is hosting an event with Clay Clark, who also did interview Ms. Marquette. 

 

As demonstrated, all roads to Madyson lead back to the false prophets, and it seems likely this will come back to haunt them all soon enough.

This prophetic unraveling reminds me of "The Woman and the Snake" poem that Trump reads at his rallies. 

The story tells of a woman who nursed a snake back to health, only to have it bite and kill her. She didn't understand why the snake would do that, which the snake rightly tells her she should have known better.

Similarly, these self-proclaimed prophets shouldn't be so surprised when Madyson comes after their friends. 

Kunneman struck a nerve with Madyson. Madyson seems to be going after her followers' beloved "prophets," because they either called her out or "wouldn't ask her about her story."

Kunneman and Bollock don't NEED to ask Madyson ANYTHING about her tall tales. Madyson is an attention seeking liar, as this blog has proven. Even Kunneman, who said that cures for cancer would come out as a result of a synagogue shooting, debunked her claims to being a witness to tribunals in his video. 

What's amusing is watching Madyson miscalculate that this doesn't resonate with her audience. She didn't seem to understand that borrowing the talking points about Kunneman and company being false prophets is not an opinion her audience holds. It's one that many of her critics maintain. 

Several days after her intitial attack on Kunneman, she was bold enough to mount another.

She got him there.

Then she commented on Kunneman's wealth. 

Then she makes an ignorant remark about General Mike Flynn, who is retired and as covered in a previous post, has no ability to prosecute human trafficking cases. 

On the contrary, General Flynn is good friends with these liars and cheats. 

She winds her scroll of a post down with an interesting remark. 

After a post full of condemnation, suggesting Kunneman is either friends with pedophiles, or even is one, Madyson hasn't said "anything negative" about Kunneman? 

Give me a break. 

These false prophets are getting what they deserve. 

----- 

Additional Notes: 

Quick Breakdown and Debunk of this Rant by Madyson

Yes. The burden of proof is on the accusor. The accused has a right to a trial by his peers, called a jury. That's called Law 101. 

No, you need at least two people to establish credibility. Madyson also claims to reject the "corrupt" American legal system because it is a "bankrupt corporation" and she is a "Sovereign Citizen," so why does she lean on "in a court of law"?

No, more people have not come forward against these pastors at tribunals. Look it up, you WON'T find it. 

But you WILL find that she was sued for slander by her former employer, HAYS US.

You will also find that military tribunals don't try civilians. Military tribunals would also fall under the "bankrupt corporation" that is America, so they are not valid according to Madyson's own logic.

If you have the evidence, just show it already. Stop stalling, and file criminal complaints with the authorities.

You can tell me all you want, but there are no "receipts."

That's not how accusations or the law works. Madyson must have slept through law school and that's why no one can find her name on any bar association's website.

It probably was. Or it was for attention.

Then prove it with your "receipts" instead of just talking about it.

No you don't, or you would have sued them after a criminal trial by now.

This is a cop-out. This does not require any spiritual discernment because her claims defy common sense and the information to disprove her is all over the Internet. 

Concerning her claims about Mike Erre:

This is entirely incorrect. Madyson posted screenshots of her conversations with the church leadership, and they did not claim to do their own investigation, but they consulted an outside organization. An independent source also confirmed that the outside source was a nationally recognized organization that saves people from human trafficking. 

No one has also come forward against Erre, and she has not provided any evidence they have, so it's safe to assume they are not real.